<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Vinod &#187; features that DotTel lacks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.vinod.pro/tag/features-that-dottel-lacks/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.vinod.pro</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:39:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Features that DotTel lack</title>
		<link>http://www.vinod.pro/general/features-that-dottel-lacks</link>
		<comments>http://www.vinod.pro/general/features-that-dottel-lacks#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:14:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vinod</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[.tel lacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DotTel lack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features that .Tel lacks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[features that DotTel lacks]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.vinod.pro/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Before I get to see the arguments around this post, let me clarify that I know what is DotTel all about and how different it is from a normal website. But I think there are few bits those DotTel lacks and should consider providing these features in near future. 1. Custom Logo There is no [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--> <!--[if gte mso 10]><br />
<mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --></p>
<p><!--[endif]-->Before I get to see the arguments around this post, let me clarify that I know what is DotTel all about and how different it is from a normal website.</p>
<p>But I think there are few bits those DotTel lacks and should consider providing these features in near future.</p>
<p>1. <strong>Custom Logo</strong><br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-133" title="dottel-logo" src="http://www.vinod.pro/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/dottel-logo.bmp" alt="dottel-logo" /></p>
<p>There is no option to have a custom logo. Personally, I feel that when someone stop by my DotTel I like them to see my custom logo rather than the existing default .Tel Logo.</p>
<p>I bet any company would be interested in showing off their brand image rather than having the default DotTel logo. Companies spend fortune on branding.</p>
<p>2. <strong>Custom or Multiple layouts</strong><br />
Again, there is no option to have a different background. The least Telnic could do is to have a set of templates where the DotTel owners have an option to select from these available options. Personally I want my DotTel to have a white background with custom logo with which people at least can recognise immediately where they landed on <img src='http://www.vinod.pro/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>3. <strong>Section Heading</strong><br />
<img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-134" title="keywords-section" src="http://www.vinod.pro/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/keywords-section.bmp" alt="keywords-section" /></p>
<p>I have no clue why they have set &#8220;Keywords&#8221; as the section heading for the sub-sections like Business Address and so on.</p>
<p>Practically it does not look professional to have the &#8220;Keywords&#8221; as section heading for Address part.</p>
<p>Either there should be an option to edit the text &#8220;Keywords&#8221; to the one that user prefers or the Business Address sub-section must be moved out of this keywords section.</p>
<p><strong>Bottom line:</strong><br />
Whatever DotTel target market is, majority of the people prefer to have unique logo &amp; background. May be these can be restricted to size and dimensions, but there is a real need of these features.</p>
<p>Communication channels like myspace, facebook and todays Twitter, all provide profile customisation Tools. Lets hope Telnic provides some level of personalization on visual aspects and the way content is sorted/displayed on DotTel, for example the one that I have mentioned above.</p>
<p>Share your thoughts on this..</p>
<div id="_mcePaste" style="overflow: hidden; position: absolute; left: -10000px; top: 0px; width: 1px; height: 1px;"><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:WordDocument> <w:View>Normal</w:View> <w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom> <w:PunctuationKerning /> <w:ValidateAgainstSchemas /> <w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid> <w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent> <w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText> <w:Compatibility> <w:BreakWrappedTables /> <w:SnapToGridInCell /> <w:WrapTextWithPunct /> <w:UseAsianBreakRules /> <w:DontGrowAutofit /> </w:Compatibility> <w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel> </w:WordDocument> </xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml> <w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" LatentStyleCount="156"> </w:LatentStyles> </xml><![endif]--><!--  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0cm; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} p 	{mso-margin-top-alt:auto; 	margin-right:0cm; 	mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; 	margin-left:0cm; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} @page Section1 	{size:612.0pt 792.0pt; 	margin:72.0pt 90.0pt 72.0pt 90.0pt; 	mso-header-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-footer-margin:36.0pt; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;} --><!--[if gte mso 10]> <mce:style><!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0cm; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman"; 	mso-ansi-language:#0400; 	mso-fareast-language:#0400; 	mso-bidi-language:#0400;} --> <!--[endif]-->Before I get to see the arguments around this post, let me clarify that I know what is DotTel all about and how different it is from a normal website.</p>
<p>But I think there are few bits those DotTel lacks and should consider providing these features in near future.</p></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.vinod.pro/general/features-that-dottel-lacks/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 409/448 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.vinod.pro @ 2012-02-05 22:14:26 -->
